Peer Review Process

To assess the truth and authenticity of published articles, peer evaluation will be carried out. So get really scientific and quality articles.

Quality: Journal Of Islamic Studies will accept article submissions and will be reviewed by the editor-in-chief. So that the content of the article can be known whether it is really focused and related to the scope of the Journal of Quality: Journal of Islamic Studies. And if there is an article that has nothing to do with the scope of Quality: Journal Of Islamic Studies, the editor-in-chief will reject it.

If the article is appropriate, the editor-in-chief assigns the editor to check for plagiarism of the article. If the plagiarism is more than 35%, the article will be rejected. However, articles with less than 35% plagiarism will be followed up.

Next, two people will be assigned by the editor to review according to their expertise with the articles discussed. When in the review process, the editor and reviewer used is the Double-Peer Review Process.

The reviewer will send an article review note, the editor will send it back to the author, and ask the author to make changes based on the reviewer's notes. After the revision was received by Quality: Journal Of Islamic Studies, the group (editor, editor, editor) held a deliberation to determine whether the article was accepted or rejected. These rules are written in the acceptance letter and will be sent to the author.

See the instructions, there are 8 steps:
Reply to the editor's response to the article submission, select a review, then send an email. Commenters who don't understand can download the comment guide or contact the editor. Download the article first to open the article file Comment by adding the comment form to the file Include the article in the comments Re-upload the comment document Give suggestions for the article Confirm back that you have reviewed via email