Peer Review Process
To assess the correctness and authenticity of published articles, a peer evaluation will be conducted. So get articles that are really scientific and of good quality.
Bilqolam Journal will accept article submissions and will be checked by the editor in chief. So that the contents of the article can be seen whether it is really focused and related to the scope of the bilqolam journal. And if there is an article that has nothing to do with the scope of the Bilqolam journal, the editor in chief will reject it.
If the article is appropriate, the editor-in-chief assigns the editor the task of looking at the plagiarism of the article. If plagiarism is more than 30%, the article will be rejected. However articles with less than 30% plagiarism will be followed up.
Furthermore, two people will be assigned by the editorial staff to review according to their expertise with the articles discussed. When in the process of reviewing the editors and reviewers used is the Double-Peer Review Process.
The reviewer will send the article review notes, the editor will send it back to the author, and ask the author to make changes based on the reviewer's notes. After the revision was accepted by bilqolam, the group (editorial, editorial, editorial) conducted a consultation to determine whether to accept or reject the article. These rules are written in an acceptance letter and will be sent to the author.
See the instructions, there are 8 steps:
Reply to the editor's response to article submissions, select to review, then send an email. Commenters who don't understand can download the comment guide or contact the editor. Download the article first to open the Comment article file by adding a comment form to the file Include the article in the comments Re-upload the comment document Provide suggestions for the article Confirm again that you have reviewed by email